Doll Incident: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Rewording Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Aftermath and Backlash == | == Aftermath and Backlash == | ||
This incident has sparked massive speculation amongst the community on whether Josh’s actions suggest that he is a closet pedophile. It is worth noting that Josh did this on his own free will, with no one suggesting or encouraging him to do what he did. It is unknown whether Josh was fully aware at the time that the doll resembled a child and how simulating violence and sexual acts on it could be perceived to viewers. A counter argument can be made that Josh didn't understand the severity and depravity of his actions, possibly due to his mental deficits and lack of social awareness because of his [[autism]]. Nevertheless, his behaviour during this incident has sparked great concern amongst the community that he may seriously harbour thoughts to commit acts of sexual activity and violence against children. [https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfTShirts/comments/1lnymni/how_this_sub_is_acting_rn/ Many have shifted their views on Joshua], as like with the [[Fish Stomping Incident]], believing he may genuinely be a psychopath. [[Mr. Based]] criticised Josh's actions, saying that "anyone else would be cancelled for life", [[Tony Bame|Tony]] for "laughing like a hyena" and "egging Josh on" and the cameraman for not intervening. *video?* | This incident has sparked massive speculation amongst some parts of the community on whether Josh’s actions suggest that he is a closet pedophile. It is worth noting that Josh did this on his own free will, with no one suggesting or encouraging him to do what he did. It is unknown whether Josh was fully aware at the time that the doll resembled a child and how simulating violence and sexual acts on it could be perceived to viewers. A counter argument can be made that Josh didn't understand the severity and depravity of his actions, possibly due to his mental deficits and lack of social awareness because of his [[autism]]. Nevertheless, his behaviour during this incident has sparked great concern amongst a good portion of the community, with some even believing that he may seriously harbour thoughts to commit acts of sexual activity and violence against children, although at this time this is just speculation and Josh is not known to have actually done such things in the past. [https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfTShirts/comments/1lnymni/how_this_sub_is_acting_rn/ Many have shifted their views on Joshua], as like with the [[Fish Stomping Incident]], believing he may genuinely be a psychopath. [[Mr. Based]] criticised Josh's actions, saying that "anyone else would be cancelled for life", [[Tony Bame|Tony]] for "laughing like a hyena" and "egging Josh on" and the cameraman for not intervening. *video?* | ||
Combined with his previous sexual misconduct, including non-consensually motorboating and inappropriately touching [[Gianna Jean]] in late 2024, among other various incidents too, suggests that both Joshua may not be [[Sexuality|asexual]] afterall, or at least anymore, and that he doesn't have adequate control over his sexual urges. | A few days later, during livestreams, Josh has been pressed on the disturbing matter. One TTS donation asked Josh to "explain", Josh said it "was just a statue", "it wasn't a real person" and that "it was a joke".<ref>https://www.instagram.com/p/DLiv6kzp7Ll/</ref> Another TTS donation came through demanding Josh to apologise for his actions towards the doll. Josh again downplayed the incident, smiling very gleefully - creepily even, saying "it's just a doll".<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfTShirts/comments/1loyt4v/josh_smiles_after_being_asked_about_doll_incident/</ref> | ||
Combined with his previous sexual misconduct, including non-consensually "motorboating" and inappropriately touching [[Gianna Jean]] in late 2024, among other various incidents too, suggests that both Joshua may not be [[Sexuality|asexual]] afterall, or at least anymore, and that he doesn't have adequate control over his sexual urges. | |||
It's probably wise to assume that without consequences for Josh's actions, he will continue his disturbing behaviour into the future. | It's probably wise to assume that without consequences for Josh's actions, he will continue his disturbing behaviour into the future. |